|
Mike Carey has two X-Men stories out this
week, the other being X-Men: Legacy #210.
With this issue, Carey at least answers
one of my fundamental questions about the title's new
direction: what is the new direction? Is it
really going to be Xavier hallucinating ad infinitum?
Well, no, it isn't. The new direction is that although
Exodus has put Xavier's mind back together, he has gaps in
his memory, and so he sets out to revisit people from his
past in order to fill in the blanks. The broader theme
seems to involve Xavier learning how all these various
people see him.
This is a fairly interesting idea, and I
can now see how it works as an ongoing series - at least in
the same way that Wolverine: Origins functions as an
ongoing title. There's a remarkably heavy emphasis on
history and continuity here, to an extent that we haven't
seen in the X-books - in fact, in Marvel generally - for
several years. This seems to have been earmarked as
the book for hardcore X-Men fans who really care about
seeing it all brought together.
Now, for readers like us, there's a lot
to enjoy here. But I'm not so sure what casual fans
are supposed to make of a book which offhandedly blurts out
montages of references to stories published 10, 20, 30, even
40 years ago. And given what I'm about to say about
DC Universe Zero, I really have to address that point.
Here's the thing. On the one hand,
all you really need to know in order to follow this story is
that Exodus is trying to convince Xavier to change his ways,
by showing him images of things that went wrong as a result
of his pacifist approach. And casual readers will get
that, because it's carefully explained at the end of the
issue.
But they might get a little lost along
the way. The opening page alone references X-Men:
Deadly Genesis (twice), the "Danger" storyline from
Astonishing X-Men, and the Legion arc from mid-1980s
New Mutants. Later in the issue, we get an
out-of-context blast from Deadly Genesis again,
followed another montage page with the Dark Phoenix Saga,
and some panels which would be utterly meaningless unless
you recognised them as scenes from Legacy Virus stories.
And the context isn't there to enable casual readers to do
that.
I'd be terribly confused reading this
comic as a newcomer, because I would assume - correctly -
that large chunks of it were going over my head. Now,
as it happens, the bits the casual readers won't understand
aren't particularly important. They're simply examples
of Exodus' general point. But the casual reader
doesn't know that. Really, this is a book which cries
out, if not for footnotes, then at least for a couple of
paragraphs of notes on the letters page.
There's also a bizarre argument about the
Sentinels which doesn't make any sense at all, even if you
do know the story. Exodus shows Xavier a clip of the
original Silver Age Sentinel story followed by the
destruction of Genosha at the start of Grant Morrison's
New X-Men. Then he complains that Xavier should
have hunted down Bolivar Trask's family and killed them all,
thus averting the attack on Genosha. Er... what?
Leave aside the "would you shoot Hitler" moral argument -
what possible reason did the X-Men have to think that
Trask's family were a threat to anyone? This is just
baffling, and I can't help wondering whether the scene was
originally based on a misunderstanding of Sentinel
continuity, awkwardly fudged over in the final dialogue.
Anyway. If you get a warm glow from
continuity and - perhaps more to the point - from the sense
that everything fits together into a bigger story, then this
is the book for you. I fall into that category, but
then I'm the hardest of the hardcore. I'm much more
sceptical of the appeal which this book could hold to a less
obsessive audience.
Rating: B
back |
continue |