|
The cull of C-list X-books continues, as
Rogue dies with issue #12.
Again, this is a character who really
doesn't belong in a solo title, simply because it's not in her
nature to be having solo adventures apart from the team.
Plus, the peak of Rogue's popularity was almost 20 years ago
now. It really shouldn't be a big surprise that two
perfectly decent creative teams haven't managed to make the
book work. Fundamentally, very few people want to read a
Rogue solo title, whatever's in it.
The big change from this storyline turns
out to be that Rogue inherits Sunfire's powers permanently.
Since Iceman is there to witness it, it's a little irritating
that it seemed to come as a surprise to him in X-Men
#171 - really, how hard is it to keep that sort of thing
straight, especially when the scene is being written
specifically as a continuity reference?
That said, it's not a bad move for the
character. As a pure power-leecher, Rogue is just way
too limited to be of much use as a recurring character.
It's a villain gimmick, not a hero one. At least this
gets her properly back into circulation without simply hitting
the reset button.
But the story ends up being a little
unsatisfying. Blindspot is an reasonable enough attempt
to create a kind of opposite number for Rogue, to act as part
of her rogue's gallery. You wouldn't really want to see
her back in future, because there's a limit to what she can
really do with those powers, but the basic idea of Blindspot
reaching out to one of her friends after erasing herself from
everyone's memories is nice enough.
The mechanics of her powers seem a bit
shaky, though. If Rogue's really been reset to the
Silver Age mindset for most of this issue, for example, then
she ought to be rather more surprised by the line-up of X-Men
who come to fight her. For that matter, merely absorbing
their powers should carry with it a clear explanation of what
she's been missing out on. (The story suggests that it
does, but doesn't really explain why Rogue doesn't act
accordingly.) If Rogue still retains enough of her
previous attitudes to respond to Gambit on any level, why
didn't something similar apply to the Silver Samurai?
Oh, and if Gambit's going to mention her name in order to
prove that they have a relationship, it would be nice if he
got it right. It's Anna Marie, not just Marie.
The issue also skips out on the obvious
question of whether Rogue's inherited Sunfire's persona as
well, which ought to be a fundamental part of the revised
character. They seem to be leaving open the possibility
of Sunfire surviving - I suspect a miraculous resurrection
post-House of M, not least because he's appearing
during it. Still, it's such a key point that it feels
odd for the characters not to bring it up.
Karl Moline's art seems rather rushed in
this issue, even despite a fill-in on issue #11. It's
competent enough, but it's certainly not pretty, and it verges
on sketchiness at times.
Bedard has held my attention with the
storyline up to this point because there were some interesting
ideas in there. Unfortunately, the pay-off doesn't
properly follow them through, and the plot glitches mount up
to an irritating degree. It does leave Rogue as a more
workable character for the core title, but it really didn't
work as a solo title.
Rating: C
back |
continue |