Also this week:
DEFENDERS #10 - AIM let the Headmen make fools of themselves, and
the Defenders start the set-up for next year's plot. It really does
crawl along, this book, but it's starting to hit its mark as a
self-mocking throwback. Still, hopefully the storyline will start
going somewhere soon, since the joke hasn't got an unlimited shelf
life.
B
ESTABLISHMENT #2 - Well, there's fewer pointless TV references this
time round, although the ones that remain are still generally an
annoying distraction. Is a scene of a building full of corpses
really given any more power by having a warmed-over Fawlty Towers
gag in the establishing shot? No, it is not. In any event, this
is a reasonably good "monsters smashing up small town" story with
Charlie Adlard proving to be surprisingly suited to the material.
Two issues in, Edginton has yet to really tell us anything much
about who the Establishment are, but he's got a strong enough
central narrative to just about get away with that.
B+
GREEN ARROW #9 - Okay, now I have no clue what the hell this is
doing here. In the middle of a completely unrelated Green Arrow
storyline, it's time for a Stanley & His Monster Vertigo-style
updating. Er, why? What has this got to do with Green Arrow,
anyway? It's okay for what it is, but I just don't see the point
of shoving this rather contrived update into a Green Arrow serial.
B-
HOPELESS SAVAGES #3 - The punk-throwback title continues its solemn
message that it's okay to be whoever you want to be, within very
tightly defined limits. I dunno... I seem to be in the minority
here, but while I can see this is a nicely constructed book which I
really ought to like, there's a misty-eyed nostalgic quality to
its view of punk that I can't quite endorse. Then again, I was
one of the people who thought the Sex Pistols reunion tour was a
good idea because it allowed them to smash one final icon, namely
their own reputation. My idea of punk is way more political than
not liking Starbucks and being broadly opposed to the Bay City
Rollers - though I strongly endorse the latter opinion - and
something just feels a bit off to me.
B-
NIGHTSIDE #1 - Robert Weinberg returns with a creator-owned book,
which is good news for those of you who were fans of his run on
Cable. This time he's returned to his home turf, and some concepts
from his novels, by giving us a private detective who investigates
affairs of the occult creatures who live alongside us without us
noticing. Yes, it's that sort of book. And nothing wrong with it
if you like that sort of thing, but it's not a genre that's ever
interested me a great deal, and this is not the book to change that.
It looks good, with Tom Derenick's art suiting the "shot from
pencils" look, and some strong colouring from Avalon. On the other
hand, the underground club full of skulls looks a bit silly, and
the character's cheesecake costume does not do wonders for her
credibility. Still, if you find the idea of a Robert Weinberg
modern-day fantasy comic appealing then this is probably going to
meet your expectations.
B
PETER PARKER, SPIDER-MAN #36 - It's a shaggy dog story leading up
to a twist on the final page. Quite good, but to be honest you
could cut this back rather drastically, use it as a back-up strip
in an annual, and it wouldn't be greatly compromised. This book
does seem to be making a conscious effort to duck out on the
overall plot at the moment while Straczynski sorts things out at
his end, and while that's all very laudable from a continuity
point of view, in this kind of market the book cannot afford to be
labelled as the Irrelevant Spider-Man Book. Which, unfortunately,
is presently what it is. Still, a decent read nonetheless.
B+