Well, QUANTUM AND WOODY is back. Never read it first time
round, mainly to annoy the people who kept trying to get
me to read it. If you bastards won't read Infinite Jest,
I'm not going to read your favourite series. So there.
But every week I look for some kind of new series to
review here, and to be honest I was planning to try it,
and anyhow, it was this or some piece of blood-and-tits
shite from Chaos, so here we go. I'd been considering
holding off till next issue, actually, but what the hell.
Now, I realise that this is a gimmick issue. The gimmick
is that if the series hadn't been cancelled in the first
place, it would now be up to issue #32, so here's issue
#32. Rather foolishly, I had picked the book up thinking
that if it was out of context already, how could I be at
that much of a disadvantage from not having read the thing
before? I mean, it'd be just as if it was the real issue
#32 and I was starting to read it then, right?
Wrong. This isn't out of context at all. It screams its
context from the rooftops. It's clearly designed to be
read and interpreted in the light of the previous series.
How the hell did we get here from there, is what I'm
meant to be thinking. Except of course I'm not, since I
don't know where there was. Woody's a black girl? Sure,
fine, whatever. Quantum's a tad chubby? Okay, sure.
The original Woody's a villain? If you say so. Am I
supposed to be getting something from this?
Now, sure, I can look at the story, and I can vaguely
follow the general idea, and I can get roughly a third of
the jokes, and I can see it's obviously a well put together
affair, but since it's not even a complete story (it's a
notional part three of four), there's really no way to
describe it from a newcomer's perspective without using the
words "Completely Incomprehensible" in a rather prominent
way. And this from a writer who said that he thought
Deadpool wasn't accessible enough. To be honest, it isn't,
but if Deadpool is hard to get into, this is like Fort
Knox.
This gimmick is, commercially, a mistake. It was a
mistake when Image did it with Images of Tomorrow and it
was a mistake when Marvel did something broadly similar
with Flashback Month (check the sales chart for that
month and see the Marvel titles drop). Being a gimmick
with a spectacular track record of creative and commercial
failure, not to mention enormously exclusive of newcomers,
it seems a downright perverse way of starting any series -
especially one whose sales last time round could never
really be described as healthy.
Christopher Priest has justified the approach by saying
that family (ie, the existing fanbase) come first. That's
an extremely short-term view. How are the fanbase served
by giving them a glimpse into a future a year and a half
down the line while simultaneously scaring off the new
readers that are surely needed if the book is ever going
to get there?
I'm not going to bother giving this a rating. There's no
point. Either you already know the book and have a
perspective so different from mine that my views are
beside the point, or you don't and you'll just be baffled
no matter how good it might theoretically be. Is it any
good? Well, it does look generally as though if I
understood what the hell was going on, I'd be enjoying it.
But I don't, and I'm not. Make of that what you will.
For christ's sake, if any issue of a series should be a
good jumping on point, surely this should have been it?