|
|
|
New X-Men #131 finds us between
story arcs, so we get a token epilogue to the Weapon XII plot
in the form of Darkstar's funeral, followed by two parallel
stories advancing character arcs. The common theme here
is dysfunctional relationships and seduction.
Getting roughly half the book is the Scott
and Emma arc, which has been on a very, very slow boil for
most of Morrison's run. (In other words, he mentions it
every three months or so.) Emma has a chat with Scott
about his feelings for Jean and, despite protesting that she
doesn't want to cross Jean again, she seems to be setting out
to break up their marriage.
There's some validity to the common
criticism that comics writers seem congenitally unable to
leave happily married couples alone, since drama equals
conflict, and if you have an ongoing series then the conflict
can never end. On the other hand, Jean and Scott have
had a good eight years of blissful harmony, so it's fair
enough to start probing around the edges. Morrison's
version of Scott seems to draw more heavily on the
excuse-making character who walked out on his wife back in the
1980s for no terribly good reason, but that's a part of the
character's history whether people like it or not. If
anything, this version of Scott might deviate from the
template by being a little too interesting. I've always
found Scott a bit dull.
The other subplot takes us back to Angel
and the Beak at the school, with Angel kissing him for a bet
and the Beak falling hopelessly in love with him. All
very soapy, not to mention a shamelessly stock plot, but I
like the dynamic Morrison's established between these two
characters. The obvious way to go from here is a
transition into a real relationship, softening Angel and
giving the Beak a bit more confidence, which would be your
classic "wish fulfilment for teenage readers" angle.
Despite my better judgment that it would be an awful cliche,
I'd quite like to see it. Beak is a bit of a caricature,
but Angel's showing signs of being an interesting character.
This week's guest artists (does this book
even have regular artists in any meaningful sense any more?)
are John Paul Leon and Bill Sienkiewicz. It's not as
heavy on the shadow as some of Leon's work, and Sienkiewicz's
inking - normally overpowering - plays it fairly straight
here. At times the work is a bit too loose, but the
layouts are strong, and they sell the characters well enough
to get the story over.
Another good issue.
Rating: A-
back |
continue |