|
|
|
The third and final book in the
U-Decide stunt (which, by the way, isn't actually mentioned
anywhere in any of the books) is Ron Zimmerman's Ultimate
Adventures, a comic which practically screamed "I am a bad
idea" from the moment it was announced. As Ron Zimmerman
comics will tend to do.
Number one, it diluted the
U-Decide concept by shoving a third comic into the feud which
had no real point in being there. Number two, it diluted
the Ultimate imprint by using it for a gimmick miniseries.
Number three, it was a Batman and Robin pastiche, and boy,
we've never seen that before. And number four, it was by
Ron Zimmerman, which promised yet more thrilling internet
discussions here 99% of readers say the book is crap, and Joe
Quesada responds by sounding hurt, posting Zimmerman's CV
again, and telling us all to be more appreciative of Howard
Stern's friends in future.
But you know what? The
book's not bad.
Yes, it's a U-Decide book, but so
is Captain Marvel. Ultimate Adventures
isn't a point scoring exercise and the content has nothing to
do with the gimmick. Yes, it's an Ultimate book, and it
probably shouldn't be, but that's not really material for
present purposes.
Yes, it's a glaring Batman &
Robin reference. And making it so blatant is probably a
mistake. The story is about Hank Kipple, who's been in
an orphanage since birth, who gets adopted by local superhero
Hawk-Owl. The twist is that Hank is your typical
Zimmerman smart-ass protagonist, and Hawk-Owl is a nice chap
who doesn't seem all that vengeful at all and has no real clue
what he's going to do with an orphan once he's adopted one.
In fact, they're not really much
like Batman and Robin when you take away the costumes, and the
riff seems to be more on the general concept of kid sidekicks
(some twenty years after everyone but Batman stopped using
them, admittedly). The book doesn't seem to be intended
as an outright parody of Batman and Robin, and it does itself
no favours by making the parallels to those specific
characters so obvious. Believe me, everyone would have
got the point anyway.
The thing is, this isn't a parody book at
all, even though it looks like one. It's not even really
a comedy book. It has the standard Zimmerman
protagonist, but this time round he's unpopular with his peers
and vulnerable at the core. If I was into pop
psychology, I'd suggest that other Zimmerman lead characters
are obnoxious bastards whom all of his other characters
worship because that's how Zimmerman likes to see himself.
But this is about Zimmerman's self-doubt and recognition that
he adopts this persona as a defence mechanism. Or maybe
not. It doesn't matter in the slightest, but it's
certainly an obvious reading of his stories.
It certainly makes Hank a more
attractive character than most of Zimmerman's protagonists,
who seem to be universally adored by all around them.
He's still a bit of a whining bastard, mind you.
Zimmerman stories are notable for having very, very similar
lead characters who all stand around delivering rants about
the injustice of the world in a way that suggests he's using
them as an outlet for stand-up material. This is a
definite improvement, but the lack of diversity is still
notable.
Making a somewhat incongruous
appearance on art is Duncan Fegredo, who hasn't been on a
regular title in a while. You can't really go wrong with
Fegredo, even when he's saddled with a god-awful character
design for one of the leads. His orphanage is a bit on
the nineteenth century side, but it's generally the usual good
work. To be honest, I'd really rather see Fegredo
working on something more offbeat, but he's a good choice
nonetheless.
Even so, this is a story with
broadly likeable characters who work taken at face value,
without needing the Batman and Robin stuff to prop them up.
It's really not bad, despite its flaws, and it could
conceivably work as an ongoing title. At the very least,
it should finally give Ron Zimmerman a reasonably
well-received comic and go some way towards explaining why
Quesada is so keen on him.
Rating: B+
back |
continue |