|
|
|
There are two ultra-cheap freebies this
week. One is Daredevil, plugging the first part
of a new storyline. The other is Superman: The Ten
Cent Adventure, trying to draw attention to the Superman
line.
I have some scepticism about the freebie
device as a way of building sales. The Batman titles
didn't benefit all that much from Batman: The Ten Cent
Adevnture in the long run - putting Jeph Loeb and Jim Lee
on Batman proved a much more effective way of boosting
sales. Fantastic Four hasn't seen a particularly
drastic improvement in sales either. Yes, these freebie
books did boost sales, but giving away a ton of comics must be
an expensive business, and I have to wonder whether they're
delivering the long term sales to justify that cost. As
for the Gen 13 relaunch, well, that just sank like a
stone.
Sure, there's a lot of sense in cutting the
price to draw attention to a new series or a new direction.
I've never really understood the logic of making first issues
double-sized and overpriced, when it would surely make more
sense to take a hit on the price at that stage as a loss
leader. But is the extreme price-cutting of these
giveaways really generating results proportionate to the
expense?
Anyway, the point of this particular
giveaway is... uh... Hold on, let me check Previews.
Well, it's the debut of a new creative team - Steven Seagle
and Scott McDaniel. But they don't really push that
point - the house ad on the last page doesn't even tell me
which of the regular titles these guys work on. It
doesn't name the creative teams for any of them, in fact.
And thankfully, unlike the Batman issue, this is not the
beginning of another megacrossover - it sets up some new
subplots, but it's basically a self-contained story. So
really, it's just a matter of saying "Here's the sort of
Superman story we do these days."
And it's alright. The main story
introduces Amok, formerly an utterly ineffectual supervillain
who's now been vastly powered-up. The basic gag of the
villain thinking he has a personal feud with a superhero who's
never even noticed him has been done before, but it's still a
fun idea. There's the introduction of a new villain
group called the Futuresmiths, and a twist on an old element
of the Superman mythos. There's a reassertion of
traditional "heroes don't kill" values, and of the character's
dual role as a man and a superhero. And there's a lovely
panel of him in front of an American flag. There's a
subplot about Clark's secret identity being exposed, although
it's hardly a major mental exercise to come up with a solution
for him. It looks very nice, because it's drawn by Scott
McDaniel, and it's pleasantly told by Seagle, even if it does
open with his usual writing tic of having a narrator who
spends two pages reading from the Junior Book Of
Atmospheric Conditions to kick off the story.
It's perfectly good. But at the end
of the day it's Superman, and it does nothing to change my
normal attitude towards Superman - namely, I don't really
care. Yes, I know he's an icon. Yes, I know he's
the original superhero. It says so on the last page and
everything. But you know what? I don't watch films
of trains pulling into stations, I don't drive a Model T Ford,
I don't fly in a biplane, and when it comes to deciding
whether to read his current stories, I couldn't give a toss if
Superman is the first superhero. He's still bland.
But then, I've always felt that way about
Superman, so that's not necessarily a criticism of the story.
If you're actually interested in Superman, you'll probably be
happy with this. There's nothing wrong with it.
It's a Superman story, quite a decent one. But it's
nothing you wouldn't expect to find in a Superman story.
It's unlikely to change your mind.
Rating: B
back |
continue |