|
|
|
Daniel Way is in the awkward position of
being a writer seemingly far more popular with Marvel than he
is with the readership.
In the past, Marvel has occasionally become
besotted with writers who they continued to use in the face of
near-overwhelming audience disapproval - Chuck Austen and Ron
Zimmerman being two of the more obvious examples. Way
isn't quite in that league. Editors love him, and have
put him on the faintly ridiculous Ten Terrific list.
(Although isn't it nice to see new talent like Joss Whedon
being promoted?) Readers... just don't much seem to
care. He's been around for a good few years now, but
still hasn't produced anything that could be described as a
breakthrough hit. On the other hand, his CV includes a
few high-profile bombs, such as the unfortunate recent
Venom series.
His previous collaboration with Steve
Dillon was a Bullseye miniseries and, in many ways,
better than you might expect. It had a nicely
constructed plot, some amusing twists, and some interesting
ideas about the character. On the other hand, it also
had a string of largely irrelevant flashbacks (which, to be
fair, was probably in the remit from the start), and it was
structured around a spectacularly un-visual series of
conversations between three people in a room. Way's
recent Wolverine arc, the House of M crossover,
had a similar structure.
All of which has generally contributed to
my impression of Daniel Way. Talented, to be sure.
But too slow. Too talky. Not visual enough.
Not really suited to this medium. Oh, and tends to write
stories which aren't actually about the advertised lead
characters.
Punisher vs Bullseye is, I suspect,
partly the result of Marvel wanting to do a sequel to
Bullseye: Greatest Hits, but realising that it didn't
actually sell very well. So here's the Punisher to
provide some star power. Since Bullseye is a hitman, it
won't come as any surprise to learn that the story involves
the mob hiring Bullseye to kill the Punisher. The good
news is that there's more to the book than that; the bad news
is that "more" doesn't actually involve the lead characters.
Half of the first issue is two mob characters, one with a
wacky transvestite gimmick straight out of Garth Ennis' black
comedy issues, talking about the plot. The Punisher
turns up in four panels of a flashback; Bullseye is there
right at the end. But basically, once again, Way is
writing stories about supporting characters whom he seems to
find far more interesting than the supposed stars of the
story.
To be fair, this is an old standby for
writers who can't actually change anything about the lead
characters. And the mobsters are, in fact, quite
interesting characters. They're also slightly amusing,
in a Garth Ennis Lite sort of a way. But I'm getting the
sinking feeling I get with a lot of Daniel Way stories - "Oh
look, here's a brand name character I can nail my unrelated
story onto."
Dillon is a good match for Way, because
he's one of the handful of artists so skilled in body language
and facial expression that he can actually make these lengthy
conversation scenes - five straight pages of two characters in
a room! - somewhat interesting to look at. He's also
cornered the market in sympathetic, beaten-down losers.
But overall, it's a story that reminds of me of many things
that I've never liked about Way's work, combined with a dash
of stuff that worked much better when Garth Ennis did it.
All told, the issue leaves me more excited about the prospect
of re-reading some of Ennis' earlier Punisher stories than
about further issues of this.
Rating: B-
back |
continue |