|
|
|
I've generally been avoiding DC Universe
titles for the last while because, frankly, they all seem to
be part of this multi-year mega-crossover that I couldn't
care less about. In fact, I was actually enjoying the
current Green Arrow and Black Canary
miniseries to the point where I thought I might try their
new title. And then I saw the house ad with the
Countdown logo. So much for that idea.
I nearly didn't bother with Metal Men
either, since it proudly displays a logo saying "From the
pages of 52." This turns out to mean "The Metal
Men appeared in 52, although this story has nothing
whatsoever to do with that one." If I hadn't picked up
that information from a blog somewhere on the day of US
release (which is one day before the books hit the shelves
over here), I'd have left this issue on the shelf on the
strength of that logo. This isn't a point of
principle, or anything. I just can't be bothered with
this ridiculous mutli-year crossover, and whatever it is DC
are doing, it certainly can't be worth the hassle of trying
to jump aboard now.
But Metal Men - on the face of it,
at least, has nothing to do with any of this. Instead,
it's another relaunch of a C-list DC character based on some
notes by Grant Morrison. Not that he actually worked
on the book - it's written and drawn by Duncan Rouleau.
But the credits proudly contain the eyebrow-raising
information that the book is "Based on ideas by Grant
Morrison." You know, if you're going to put in a
credit like that, you might want to credit Robert Kanigher
and Ross Andru for creating the characters in the first
place. Just a thought.
This is an odd book. It's certainly
not bad, and at times it's even quite endearing, but it
doesn't make me want to read more. The story is in
three acts, which don't seem to have very much to do with
each other. The first part of the book, set in the
fifth century, sees a wizard and a demon thingy fighting
over an artefact, only for a time traveller to snatch it
away at the last minute. Then there's a present-day
sequence with the Metal Men fighting UNION, a sort of
collective intelligence which is possessing consumer
electronics and leading them in a revolt against their human
masters.
After that, though, we cut back to some
kind of origin sequence featuring Doctor Magnus, the Metal
Men's creator, as a young scientist pitching for funding.
He gives us a lecture on impenetrable comic book physics,
but then, through some kind of meddling, he's apparently led
to go off on another path entirely. I assume this is
supposed to be some variation on the established Metal Men
origin story; it doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone
involved that there might be readers who don't know it by
rote.
It's a book with good moments that
doesn't quite add up to a persuasive whole. UNION is a
cute idea, and the theme of rebellious machines can always
be made to work. Magnus' impenetrable lecture is
downright charming, and the best bit of the issue. And
Rouleau is doing great art these days - he used to be a
crazily exaggerated, angular artist, but now he's using that
style in a much more controlled, effective way. His
scripting is pretty good, as well, although as with
All-New Atom, it's not too hard to play "Spot the Grant
Morrison concept." ("Imagine an inch-high dentist..."
seems a good bet.)
But there's an awful lot going on and not
much that seems to tie it together. The opening
sequence is longer than it needs to be. And the
biggest problem is that it just doesn't engage by interest
in the Metal Men themselves. They're not defined
strongly enough as individual characters. They're more
of an amorphous mass, and it feels almost as though they
were only included in the book because they came as a
package deal with Magnus. They're not even especially
kooky; they're just sort of there.
That's the point where the book really
comes unstuck for me - it just doesn't make its lead
characters interesting. Which is a shame, because it
nails Magnus as an eccentric scientist. The book has
its moments, and they're good moments, but it doesn't quite
hang together for me.
Rating: B-
back |
continue |