|
Whatever else you say about Vertigo, you've
got to give them credit for experimentation. It's hard
to imagine anyone else putting out a comic as frankly
bizarre as Rick Veitch's satire Army@Love.
When I saw the preview pages of this a
few weeks ago, I couldn't make up my mind whether it was
genius or an absolute trainwreck. I'm still not
altogether sure, although I'm leaning heavily towards
trainwreck. But it's an incredibly weird premise, and
there are more than a few things that don't really click.
That said, you've got to give it credit for sheer audacity.
It's the near future and the US Army is
caught up in a war in "Afbaghistan." Nobody bothers to
explain the purpose of that war, because it seems to be
pretty much incidental to them. Instead, the Army has
resorted to encouraging its soldiers to head to war under
the dubious inspiration of the new Motivation & Morale
project, which does ridiculous things like allowing them to
take cellphones into combat, and sponsoring orgies.
The basic satirical idea here is,
presumably, the increasingly absurd lengths which the US
government might have to resort to in order to persuade
anyone to sign up for the military in the first place.
Certainly there are recruitment problems, so there's a germ
of truth to this. The problem is that it doesn't ring
true.
We've got an army of American soldiers
here who, a couple of beleaguered officers aside, seem to
think they're appearing in a pornographic video game.
Even if you might be able to enlist people on a ridiculous
"war is fun" campaign, here we're asked to believe that
soldiers are sticking to that mentality even while they're
killing other people and, presumably, seeing their friends
get shot from time to time.
On top of that, the plot involves the
Motivation & Morale crew being shocked to learn that news of
their officially-sponsored orgies have been leaked to the
media. But why would anybody halfway sane have thought
they could keep that kind of thing secret in the first
place?
This is the basic problem with
Army@Love. Even allowing for the fact that it's
absurdist satire, and giving it a huge amount of leeway, the
book is full of characters who just don't seem to have any
relationship to recognisable human personalities. And
for this to work, you can get away with "wildly
exaggerated", but not with "divorced from reality."
So to be honest, it doesn't really work.
But despite myself, I have to admire it - partly for being a
good-looking comic, and partly for the sheer gall of
attempting it at all.
Rating: C
back |
continue |