|
Harvey Pekar's American Splendor has
been around since the mid-1970s, and it's one of those
acclaimed indie books that I've studiously ignored over the
years.
The title, and the bombastic logo, are of
course ironic. Pekar writes autobiographical stories
about everyday events. So far as the plot is
concerned, they're generally rather mundane. But
that's the point; Pekar isn't really telling us stories so
much as delivering observations about life.
Vertigo is now producing a four-issue
miniseries in which, as always, Pekar writes stories for an
assortment of artists to draw. Of the four stories in
here, two are simply wry two-page shorts. The longer
stories see Ty Templeton illustrating Pekar's reflections on
his parents aging and death, and Dean Haspiel collaborating
on a summary of what Pekar did one day. No, really,
that's pretty much the story.
It's an odd book. Its strength lies
in Pekar's willingness to be almost unbelievably mundane -
he devotes half a page to the mechanics of paying his
artists and the simple pleasure of finding out that the
system at the bank is slightly simpler than he was
expecting. None of the events are, strictly speaking,
interesting in themselves, but at his best Pekar captures
everyday moments and details that are immediately
recognisable.
On the other hand, while the details are
excellent, the big picture is often less satisfying.
The longer stories peter out rather than end. And some
of the mechanics are downright clumsy - for example, to tell
us that his parents were pleased about the creation of
Israel, we get a panel with a narrative caption spelling it
out, a map of Israel, and a drawing of Harvey's dad reading
a newspaper with a story about Israel and saying "I'm so
lucky that Israel was reborn during my lifetime."
There are naively laboured moments like
this scattered throughout the book, and I'm not quite sure
whether they're downright irritating, or have an
outsider-art charm. At times Pekar is spelling out the
action in a way that would have been fairly standard comic
book storytelling thirty years ago, but now feels faintly
anachronistic.
But the value of this book is in the
details, and in its strangely awkward way, the details ring
true on an unusually small scale.
Rating: A-
back |
continue |