|
I am losing patience with Ultimate
Nightmare.
Warren Ellis wrote a column a couple of
months back in which he deplored the tendency in some quarters
to use the word "decompressed" as if it were synonymous with
"slow and boring." As he rightly says, decompression is
a tool, which can be used well or used badly. Depending
on what you want to achieve, it might be the right tool for
the job. Or it might not.
Ultimate Nightmare is decompressed.
It is also slow and boring. In issue #1, nasty messages
started coming from Russia, and the X-Men and the Ultimate
independently decided to investigate. In issue #2, they
travelled to the site. In issue #3, they wander around
the complex for a bit, and fight a couple of run down
supervillains. And that's it.
True enough, there is action in this issue.
There is fighting. But there is bugger all advancement
of the plot which, frankly, has barely inched forward since
issue #1. What we get here is a repeat of basically the
same sequence, once with the Ultimates and the Unicorn, and
once with the X-Men and a character I take from dialogue to be
intended as an Ultimate Crimson Dynamo, though the art makes
him look a lot more like the Juggernaut.
The common theme, of course, is that both
were originally created as Cold War era Russian villains.
The Ultimate Universe doesn't even have a Cold War phase in
its history, so these characters require more than a little
tweaking to fit them in. There may be an interesting
explanation for all this. But at this pace, I dread to
think when it might be coming.
Ultimate Nightmare is, apparently, a
prelude for the story which is going to follow in Ultimate
Secret. One can only wonder why it was felt to merit
a five issue miniseries in its own right. It's the sort
of concept Ellis has done much more effectively in a single
issue of Global Frequency, and this book just isn't in
the same league.
Incidentally, we have fill-in art in this
issue. This is one of the books being pushed as part of
the faintly ridiculous "Young Guns" promotion (a name which
conjures up images of Andrew Ridgeley every time I hear it -
possibly not what they had in mind). However, this time
round we've got Steve Epting pencilling instead. Epting
is a very good artist and perfectly at home here - low light
suits him.
Looks alright, anyhow. But painfully
slow.
Rating: C-
back |
continue |