|
|
|
Rather less inspiring is X-Men: The 198,
a series which must have seemed interesting at the pitch
stage but floundered badly on the page.
By the way, it's worth taking a moment to
emphasise how badly Marvel have overstretched the X-Men
brand - an issue that they appear to have lost sight of in
the post-Jemas era. We already have three monthly
X-Men titles: X-Men, Uncanny X-Men and Ultimate
X-Men. On top of that we have two bimonthlies,
Astonishing X-Men and X-Men Unlimited.
That's a whole lot of X-Men right there. And yet on
top of that we have X-Men: Deadly Genesis, X-Men:
The 198 and X-Men: Apocalypse vs Dracula.
Plus, in recent months, X-Men: Colossus - Bloodline
and X-Men: Kitty Pryde - Shadow & Flame. Oh
yeah, and X-Men: The End too.
Marvel complained that retailers had
initially underordered Deadly Genesis. Well,
they should reflect on the fact that most of the "X-Men"
miniseries that they've published lately have been throwaway
dross, and the majority of them haven't even been X-Men
stories at all. Such as The 198, for example,
which is really just a story about the minor supporting
characters in the refugee camp. If you keep slapping
the X-Men name onto comics that don't actually feature them,
in a shameless bid to boost sales, then eventually people
will start ignoring you. And that means that when you
hype a book like Deadly Genesis, nobody will believe
you until they actually see the product.
All of this should be too obvious to
require explanation. The number of X-Men miniseries
finally seems to be lightening up, so perhaps the point has
finally penetrated. Then again, next week sees the
launch of the absurd-sounding X-Men: Fairy Tales,
which sounds suspiciously like an attempt to sell a bunch of
fairy-tale adaptations by nailing on an X-Men logo, so
perhaps not.
Anyhow, back to the subject. The
198 is really a story about the surviving mutants in the
198 camp squabbling with the guards from O*N*E, and Mr M
emerging as a leadership figure. The theme of
political rebellion is nicely brought out by Juan Doe's
covers, which feature some of the strongest design work
we've seen in ages. Unfortunately, the actual story
misses the mark in comparison. O*N*E are presented
throughout as such a hopeless bunch of untrustworthy
assholes that there's no real complexity to any of the
issues here. Of course the 198 are in the right, and
of course O*N*E are totally in the wrong. There's
really nothing to debate here, given the way O*N*E are
written. Consequently, there isn't enough material to
the feud to fill five issues.
Worse, the story seems to think that
there really is a complex issue being discussed here.
The X-Men seem to be torn between doing things the right way
and sympathising with the 198, but ultimately they always
come down firmly on O*N*E's side. And that just makes
them look silly, because the story hasn't set up any
convincing reason for them to play along with O*N*E, to any
extent. As they're presented here, O*N*E are such
unequivocal villains that the only real question is why the
heroes aren't fighting back. The whole thing is
completely out of whack, and never really gets off the
ground as a result.
On top of all that, we don't even get a
complete story here. Mr M emerges as a leader, but
then gets killed by Johnny D. Why is Johnny D helping
O*N*E? We don't know, because he won't say.
Apparently it's just a lead-in for a future story, although
since this is the final issue of a miniseries, heaven only
knows where that future story might be appearing. As
an arc in an ongoing series this might be acceptable, if
overlong. As the finish of a five-issue miniseries,
which is supposed to tell a self-contained story, it really
won't do. (The same criticism could be made of
Deadly Genesis, quite legitimately, but at least we know
that Vulcan's story is continuing in Uncanny.)
As for Mr M, he rises from the grave and then disappears, in
a less than subtle Christ parallel.
There are some good moments in the
series, generally decent artwork, and lovely covers.
But that's about it; the story is just flat, unsatisfying in
its own right, and lacking all the complexity which the
central debate seems to demand.
Rating: C
back |
continue |